Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Rove is an ugly motherfucker--

Great article I read this p.m. from Rolling Stone labeled "Absolute.Must read" which then links to Esquires exclusive with David Plouffe "The Man Who Made Obama." READ IT. These guys pulled off one of the most impressive Presidential Campaigns ever --- and their Secret??? Gee --Dat ting cawled z entrrnet? And serious field organization. The duo of Plouffe and Axelrod ( and of course the Big Dog) did things that are simply a fucking mazing.

Watching Maddow Tivo'd from last night---She had on Axelrod, score interview --Anyways Obama team et.al - at least they seem fucking close to being true caring humans, let alone now being official Politicians. I Could never imagine Carl Rove caring about anything except fucking Tax Cuts.....not actual people. He translates his human concern into that 80's created Elephant language :..we’ve got productivity at near record heights; home ownership at record heights; home sales set new records last year; there are more people owning homes – particularly in the Hispanic and African-American communities than ever before.
their classic "Trickle Down Theory" speak of Almighty REAGAN -- see where thats taken us. The largest fucking financial problem in 100 years. I fondly remember that comfortable feel of peace and financial security of the 90's as if I were remembering my Hawaii trips---Fit, warm, drunk, and secure.

Oh right----9/11 changed the world right. There's bad guys that want to kill us is what they say--we're hated and have many enemies---or else "THEY MIGHT INVADE" and then we'll all have to take Friday afternoons off!.
An estimated 77,039 people were treated in the ER for accidents involving lawnmowers in 2006.

They were Americans. War on Lawn Mowers is in the Neo Con war plans I gather.

Out on a limb with their positions, Drug Addict Rush and Fuck Face Hannity continue inhuman 80's elephant lingo: I think Hannity must have an 8x10 glossy portrait of Reagan and each night he gives a slow deep salt licking to it, then closes on Murdoch's. His wife sleeps in a seperate bed. In his world I see Obama as the "Messiah" as he continually spews every 3 minutes. Well if Obama is the Messiah for me then I say Reagan is Midas to him. I'll take the bad ass carpenter over a dick that traded in his daughter anyday.

Plouffe and the 40 somethings, the 30 somethings and those goddamn Millenial 20 somethings are kicking the dayglow, Galleria shit right out them. A bankroll of 13 million email accounts? That is a large, large army. And its growing ---fast. I see the SPAC for Palin adds now on Drudge------most Palin 'spoters' love the email and computers right? ---Happy Trails To You, Until We Meet Again :)

Friday, February 6, 2009

OSLO: The answer my friend..... is blowin in the wind

There's a battle going on, and I want in on it. Sullivan vs. Podhoretz ----

A couple of heavyweight academics, successful writers, yada, yada, yada.

Now I know for sure Sullivan needs no defense ---- but Podhoretz reads like a real Dick.

The argument, as we all know now to be utter Bullshit, is that the war in Iraq was Necessary for the safety of American lives (Bush Doctrine,) Going to be quick and easy (liberators, flowers etc. so said Mr. Cheney on MTP) and essentially Humanitarian in nature so as to free all the poor Iraqi people suppressed by an evil dictatorship. We were sold this piece of shit rationale by the Neoconservatives history will record.

Here's the truth about Neoconservatism and Iraq in a nutshell: Keep Fighting in Iraq to maintain pressure on Iranian and Syrian governments, but also to provide a forum as a broadly swathed Ultimate Fighting ring to take on the Jihadists, and the general overall U.S. haters of all sorts from all sorts of places. That the U.S. has moved beyond the sissy Rooseveltian "Gunboat Diplomacy" but is actually willing to maintain a state of perpetual war. Negotiating is weakness. Abiding to treaties? Weakness.

Now back to the tiff between the heavyweights. The attack on Sullivan, whom I do not always agree with, is that this passage from Sullivan contains errors:

We patiently listened as neocons told us that the Palestinians are too dysfunctional a people ever to have democratic rights or their own state, but that the the ancient sectarian warfare of Iraq can be transformed in a few years!…I took neoconservatism seriously for a long time, because it offered an interesting critique of what’s wrong with the Middle East, and seemed to have the only coherent strategic answer to the savagery of 9/11. I now realize that the answer - the permanent occupation of Iraq - was absurdly utopian and only made feasible by exploiting the psychic trauma of that dreadful day. The closer you examine it, the clearer it is that neoconservatism, in large part, is simply about enabling the most irredentist elements in Israel and sustaining a permanent war against anyone or any country who disagrees with the Israeli right.


TO which Podhoretz reaches deep to say that
In fact, neoconservatives were and remain the most determined supporters of George W. Bush’s June 24, 2002 speech in which he said specifically that the United States would accept a Palestinian state just so long as that state was a democratic one
.

Was I on drugs when their election was held, Hamas wins, and then we said - well that doesn't really count? I don't recall them being the only party on the ticket either.

Then this from J. Pod:
Others — Bill Kristol and Bob Kagan most prominently — did argue that we had prepared inadequately for the occupation, and that we needed far more troops.


I'm of the belief that if you put Bill Kristol in sentence you have to include the word Douche. To base any argument with Bill Kristol -Douche - as your protagonist is beyond hysterical.

Then the kicker from J. Pod:
Andrew Sullivan no longer is interested in winning in Iraq, in fact is probably quietly eager for a defeat there, doubtless out of a combination of a certain degree of conviction, a ravenous hunger for leftist Web traffic, and because having decided a few years ago he’d picked the wrong horse in supporting it, he finds it unbearable to imagine that the wrong horse may prove to be the right horse after all.


Now I take this personal. First off - Victory in Iraq? Victory? Please show me how many "Victories" there are in our Modern History of defeating an enemy that has no uniform, no flag, and no territory? I can -- The slaughter of the Native Americans and the Aboriginals. Is that what would define a victory? Slaughter them all? That anyone who believes this is all of a sudden a wussy leftist feeding from the trough of Sullivan?

He just cannot admit the reality of a forever misunderstood region - that might is not going to solve the problem, that the revolt('s), if there ever is going to be one, will come from within itself.

I would leave this final question to J. Pod:

If rockets stop firing into Israel, will Israel suddenly become a dove? Or will they harbor their animosity? It has to be peace in what the people really want bottom line. Let the people have what they want. Get back to thinking on how to improve the Oslo accord asUri Savir believes it can be.

The ultimate lesson we can glean from Oslo's limitations is that an enduring peace must be built from the bottom up, not from the top down. Instead of relying on the same archaic peacemaking strategy we've used for centuries – and which was reflected in the Oslo process – we can embrace a new model based on nurturing mutually beneficial forms of cooperation on the local level, as well as between cities and organizations.


What do I know---I read The Daily Dish.

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

Maddow Has My Trust---Now We Can Kick Hannitys Ass.

I just finished watching last nights Maddow show and man I am in heaven with this style. It works with me very well because --Its right, and rightly presented. The cranky noise coming from the A.M. dial, and the FaUX Network---sounds well, old people cranky. I read this great article today that Sullivan linked to hereand I dont see the rabid vulture carcass stripping attack or angryness in any way. The vibe is smug here at support camp - but there has to be an element of constant defense because the HANNITY LIMBAUGH FOX machine has some power still. They are rapidly weakening as the news of the day exposed it found on Drudge.

Maddow is clearly in tune with this and completely in the zone! I'm happy for her success, Im happy for Olberman to make it happen and recognize the vibe as well by getting her on the air.

Now the nails for those assholes - They are in the minority position, they are stale dry pieces of toast that you have to eat by force as you listen to their SLIME.

CHANGE IS HERE-----

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

The strongest power: CHANGE

God Bless the Saturday morning cartoons I got to see when I was a child. I remember that feeling you'd have each Friday Night, that tomorrow ---there will be JUSTICE FOR THE WORLD!!!!!

The scenes where Aqua Man sonors ahead to a pod of grey humpback whales linking fins to tentacles making an arrayed octopus - whale net to stop a speeding rocket from slamming into the sea floor. FUCK YEAH! Happened every Saturday ---something like that, albeit by Superman - the supposed most powerful (wtf?), or Batman - who originally always had that problem of being too nice, a guy that dresses like that without any real superpower? add in Robin --- I kind of always saw that as GAY, GAY, GAY ----we now know the real way Batman is supposed to be portrayed (Thank God they got that one right!) Then there was Antman, and Flash - who is so fucking cool, and Wonder Woman - which is the reason most of my generation are not mysoginists ---we'd let her lead us into battle --looking at that ass? Imagine being captured by her thinking "I'm a prisonor tied by golden rope in an invisble jet with a hot Isle of Lesbos looking Yugoslavian - Fuck Yeah!"

I think the most underrated super heroes, of which my generation had the uttmost priviledge to be witnessed each Saturday morning was those stupid late coming tan, elf, vulcan looking - fucking weird sexual tensioned brother sister duo...a.k.a the Wonder Twins. Remember He could change into any H2O based thing, like the oxymoronic "Moving Ice Wave," then she could change into any earthly mammal creature- with a second head--but of course they could only do this as long as they were within touching proximity, then by loudly annoucing that "Wonder Twin Power, Form Of" verse. Fucking classic.

Bottom line is, they could all stop some bad thing from happening --- they could change certain events, and they changed outcomes. Powerful, yes -- but could they move through time? Could any of them travel to the future? And if you can travel to the future then do you not have the real power to change something? To make what I call Significant Outcome. I will try and define that quickly. Minor change would be predictable, mathamatically within reason... a simple defect - odds are there of it (the desired or undesired) of happening. What is not in the odds would be what I call Significant Change. I.E. - the final outcome would be the extreme, but a good example I think, would be - for instance, having the power to travel to the future and then kill the chimpanzees that carried the AIDS virus. That would have had a Significant Outcome to our current lives. Since that AIDS epidemic has occured, we can say that if a hero exists with that power, this action was not on his or her list of priorities so far.

Movies have exploited this concept in many forms. The left side being "Back To The Future" being the example on a somewhat mellow level ( I recall the middle movie being a bit dark, but not Damien like) - Then on the right, a movie like the 12 Monkeys - premised a bit more extreme than my example.

My point is -- how would we, in the present ever know that there hs been a Significant Outcome. How could we prove that there have not been any so far? Any number of scenarios can take place that could wipe us out in a heartbeat, yet here we are "sittin around - thinkin and the like." Healthy and happy. Can it be the cause of some hero going forward making that happen for me?

Is "God" the only hero that were supposed to believe has this power? Well here's what I say -----FUCK GOD! (wait........hold on..........no thunder, no lightning, no chasm rumbling apart in the earth below me------oh shit.....I'm going to live after saying that!)

Kind of gives you a bad karma after saying it, but from the Matrix we do know that Karma is just a word. Like God. Like Carlin taught us.

The best Hero story I've seen so far is the "Unbreakable" story - where the hero could see the offsite actions of an evil person, he was almost immortally indestructable, and he was humanly brave. He made a Significant Outcome - he saved people lives because of the extra sensory power coupled with the inhuman power. E.S.P is something unproven by Science, yet hugely popular amongst all current civilizations, and I would say that my Saturday morning lessons of JUSTICE are just as proven as the power of GOD.